Aaron Neville’s terrible face tattoo

Amazingly he’s had the tattoo since he was 16 years old, but having not seen any really decent quality footage of soul legend, Aaron Neville before (or non-airbrushed photos), I was shocked to see his awful face tattoo on Later With Jools Holland this week.

It’s not quite up there with Gucci Mane’s truly hideous ice cream cone face tattoo (check it out here) but still…

And whilst it looks like a crucifix, it’s actually a sword. “Why?” You may ask. And ask you may, but you won’t get a decent answer. “For no reason” he’s been reported as saying.

Oh well. Here he is doing what he does best:

9 Responses to “Aaron Neville’s terrible face tattoo”

  1. aaron you are beautiful and so is your music

  2. Who the made you the God end all be all of music critics? You don’t even know how to blow your nose! Stick to something you know like blowing it out your behind!

    • Haha – brilliant. Firstly, I don’t claim to be a music critic – I’m just a blogger writing about stuff. Secondly, if you’re going to leave a comment slating me, maybe you should proofread it first.

      • I don’t think you were critiquing his music anyway. I think you were critiquing his awful tattoo. And I don’t think you need to attend any special school or anything to do that. I’d say you were spot on, if not kind. That thing is a shit sandwich.

      • Haha – thanks Ben!

  3. conny linger Says:

    You critics are all so perfect, by the way have you produced any all time classics ? ever , oH,, And- PrOOF reDD, bloW this sucKr.

    • None of us are perfect and I certainly dont pertain to be. I can however write anything i want and comment on a tattoo if i wish to (as can you). Thanks for stopping by.

  4. Chunaski Gomez Says:

    Granted, you can criticize anything you want. But, do you do it here simply because you can? If that’s the case, then that’s just being egotistical. It seems that you’re only point is that his tattoo is shit. OK, that’s fine too, but then that makes it simply derogatory… and that’s fine, too. However, don’t you aspire to something more meaningful? Yes, I agree; freedom is paramount, but liberty to just be insulting SEEMS like shit to me. I agree that there is a story behind the tattoo and Neville’s saying “for no reason” leaves me curious for more. Nevertheless, being a jerk just because YOU can, leaves me curious for me. What’s your story?

    • I wrote about the tattoo as firstly, it seemed a strange choice on Aaron Neville’s part, secondly, it’s vaguely intriguing and thirdly, it seemed that a lot of people were interested as to why he’d had it done. It’s a terrible tattoo but my post is no comment on Aaron Neville’s often excellent back catalogue or a scathing attack on him as a man. I like him. I just think it’s a terrible tattoo and struck me as something worth writing (albeit briefly) about (which it has been as it’s been viewed thousands of times). I don’t believe freedom of speech is just an excuse to be insulting, nor do I feel I’m being a ‘jerk’ for commenting on his tattoo. If I’ve offended anyone that wasn’t my aim. There are other bad tattoos (some on celebrities, some not) I’ve written about, as have many other bloggers. I don’t see the big deal, Chunaski – some of my blogs are more meaningful, many are just me suggesting music, art and films I think are great to readers/visitors, and some are daft little things (like this). Thanks for stopping by.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 767 other followers

%d bloggers like this: